• Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Truth of Financial World
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Science
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Science
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Truth of Financial World
No Result
View All Result
Home Science

Google illegally maintained online search monopoly, US court rules

August 6, 2024
in Science
Google illegally maintained online search monopoly, US court rules
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Google illegally maintained an online search monopoly, a US court has said, in one of the biggest rulings against the company’s market dominance.

The tech giant has been successfully sued in federal court by the US Justice Department and states which argued it remained the most used internet search engine by paying smartphone makers billions to make Google the default on browsers and devices.

Money blog: US recession fear

This created anti-competitive barriers to entry for potential new or smaller search engines and further entrenched Google’s position, the government and 38 states and territories, led by Colorado and Nebraska, argued.

Regulators in the US have been trying to limit the power of tech giants like Google, Apple, Amazon and Meta through cases taken by the Justice Department as well as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Exclusive searches and Google ads

In particular, it focussed on Google’s exclusive search agreement on Android, iPhones and iPads.

The department had argued Google conducted nearly 90% of web searches, a figure Google denied.

Google ads. which generate billions for the company, also formed part of the case as the department and states said a monopoly was created inside search results. The price of ads was above what should exist within a free market, demonstrating Google’s power, the plaintiffs said.

Google said it had created a better service for consumers and was “winning because it’s better”.

It was because Google had created a better service for consumers that it was so popular. It was “winning because it’s better”, the company argued.

No remedy was laid out by judge Amit Mehta of the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Monday. He could decide to order Google to sell part of the business or change the way it operates.

“Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” he said.

Google now has a chance to appeal.

This post appeared first on sky.com

Previous Post

Doug Emhoff’s ex-wife responds after second gentleman admitted to affair with nanny

Next Post

Bangladesh’s ‘Gen Z revolution’ toppled a veteran leader. Why did they hit the streets and what happens now?

Next Post
Bangladesh’s ‘Gen Z revolution’ toppled a veteran leader. Why did they hit the streets and what happens now?

Bangladesh’s ‘Gen Z revolution’ toppled a veteran leader. Why did they hit the streets and what happens now?

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent News

    Cracker Barrel CEO serves up leftover corporate branding to unhappy customers

    Cracker Barrel CEO serves up leftover corporate branding to unhappy customers

    August 24, 2025
    The history of how Trump and Bolton’s relationship fell to tatters

    The history of how Trump and Bolton’s relationship fell to tatters

    August 24, 2025
    FBI raid of John Bolton’s home reportedly linked to classified documents probe

    FBI raid of John Bolton’s home reportedly linked to classified documents probe

    August 24, 2025
    GOP senators push for Kamala Harris’ testimony as House Oversight eyes subpoena

    GOP senators push for Kamala Harris’ testimony as House Oversight eyes subpoena

    August 24, 2025

    Disclaimer: truthoffinancialworld.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Browse by Category

    • Business
    • Politics
    • Science
    • World News

    Recent News

    Cracker Barrel CEO serves up leftover corporate branding to unhappy customers

    Cracker Barrel CEO serves up leftover corporate branding to unhappy customers

    August 24, 2025
    The history of how Trump and Bolton’s relationship fell to tatters

    The history of how Trump and Bolton’s relationship fell to tatters

    August 24, 2025
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2024 truthoffinancialworld.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • World News
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Business

    Copyright © 2024 truthoffinancialworld.com | All Rights Reserved